Best month
2026-05 achieved the best margin at 35% and the strongest profit contribution.
This page is the monthly operating lens. It shows what changed, where the model should pay attention, and which month deserves deeper explanation.
2026-05 achieved the best margin at 35% and the strongest profit contribution.
2024-11 was the weakest month on margin, which makes it the main candidate for post-mortem analysis.
SKU SAL-001, customer Walmart Supercentre GTA, and vendor Dutch Delta Seafoods are the clearest training targets.
Automated interpretation of the latest month against the trailing baseline.
2026-05 looks weaker mainly because inventory pressure is the dominant pressure point, while margin is 35% and service is 89%.
Revenue delta +15k, OTIF 82%, and forecast accuracy 95%.
Use the ranked causes below to decide whether the next action should be procurement, vendor escalation, customer follow-up, or pricing review.
Copy this directly into a weekly update, Slack message, or management deck.
Executive summary for 2026-05: Revenue was $234k with a gross margin of 35%. OTIF was 82%, service level was 89%, and stockouts reached 302 boxes. Primary risk: Inventory pressure. Action: prioritize the top-ranked cause, compare against the trailing three-month baseline, and confirm whether procurement, vendor escalation, customer follow-up, or pricing changes are needed.
2026-05: margin 35%, OTIF 82%, service 89%.
Approve the operational fix for inventory pressure and confirm the owner.
Trailing three-month margin 35%, latest forecast accuracy 95%, overdue rate 2%.
Automatic explanation of what changed in the latest month versus the prior month.
2026-05 vs prior month: revenue +15k, margin +0 pts, OTIF +0 pts, service -1 pts, stockouts +42.
Trailing three-month average margin is 35% and service level is 90%, so the model should compare the latest month against that local baseline.
Latest SKU pressure: LOB-051. Latest customer risk: Loblaws GTA. Latest vendor issue: Dutch Delta Seafoods.
Sorted from strongest operational pressure to weakest.
Stockouts moved up and service is 89%.
Dutch Delta Seafoods is the weakest vendor slice this month.
Loblaws GTA has the highest churn risk at 36%.
Overdue invoice rate is 2%, which can feed back into tighter credit and lower reorders.
Forecast accuracy is 95% against a trailing margin of 35%.
Revenue bars, stockout pressure, and service signals for each month.
Use this as a compact explanation block for model outputs or analyst notes.
The latest month should be interpreted against the trailing three-month baseline, with special attention to margin, service level, and stockout pressure rather than revenue alone.
If stockouts rose while service fell, prioritize procurement and FEFO picking. If churn risk rose, review payment and repeat-order behavior. If supplier quality fell, tighten inbound inspection and vendor escalation.
Latest month metrics, trailing three-month average, weakest SKU, riskiest customer, and weakest supplier.
Use this table to compare months and spot regressions.
| Month | Revenue | Gross profit | Gross margin | Inventory turns | Avg days to sell | Overdue rate | Repeat rate | Churn risk customers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06 | $231k | $81k | 35% | 14.89 | 2 | 6% | 73% | 0 |
| 2023-07 | $246k | $86k | 35% | 15.73 | 2 | 6% | 72% | 0 |
| 2023-08 | $243k | $84k | 35% | 15.77 | 2 | 6% | 73% | 0 |
| 2023-09 | $234k | $82k | 35% | 15.15 | 2 | 6% | 74% | 0 |
| 2023-10 | $241k | $83k | 34% | 15.32 | 2 | 7% | 75% | 0 |
| 2023-11 | $229k | $79k | 35% | 14.58 | 2.1 | 7% | 76% | 0 |
| 2023-12 | $230k | $80k | 35% | 14.69 | 2.1 | 7% | 73% | 0 |
| 2024-01 | $226k | $78k | 35% | 14.38 | 2.2 | 8% | 72% | 0 |
| 2024-02 | $212k | $73k | 34% | 13.44 | 2.2 | 8% | 73% | 0 |
| 2024-03 | $226k | $78k | 35% | 14.34 | 2.2 | 1% | 74% | 0 |
| 2024-04 | $221k | $77k | 35% | 14.14 | 2.1 | 1% | 75% | 0 |
| 2024-05 | $235k | $82k | 35% | 14.96 | 2.1 | 2% | 73% | 0 |
| 2024-06 | $233k | $81k | 35% | 14.91 | 2 | 2% | 72% | 0 |
| 2024-07 | $243k | $84k | 35% | 15.67 | 2 | 2% | 73% | 0 |
| 2024-08 | $243k | $85k | 35% | 15.57 | 2 | 2% | 74% | 0 |
| 2024-09 | $233k | $81k | 34% | 14.97 | 2 | 3% | 73% | 0 |
| 2024-10 | $239k | $82k | 34% | 15.33 | 2 | 3% | 74% | 0 |
| 2024-11 | $223k | $76k | 34% | 14.3 | 2.1 | 3% | 75% | 0 |
| 2024-12 | $225k | $78k | 34% | 14.46 | 2.1 | 4% | 74% | 0 |
| 2025-01 | $225k | $77k | 34% | 14.2 | 2.2 | 4% | 73% | 0 |
| 2025-02 | $206k | $71k | 35% | 12.85 | 2.2 | 4% | 74% | 0 |
| 2025-03 | $229k | $80k | 35% | 14.28 | 2.2 | 5% | 73% | 0 |
| 2025-04 | $224k | $78k | 35% | 14.09 | 2.1 | 5% | 74% | 0 |
| 2025-05 | $238k | $83k | 35% | 15.04 | 2.1 | 5% | 73% | 0 |
| 2025-06 | $236k | $82k | 35% | 14.97 | 2 | 5% | 73% | 0 |
| 2025-07 | $243k | $85k | 35% | 15.66 | 2 | 6% | 72% | 0 |
| 2025-08 | $244k | $84k | 35% | 15.71 | 2 | 6% | 73% | 0 |
| 2025-09 | $234k | $81k | 35% | 15.16 | 2 | 6% | 74% | 0 |
| 2025-10 | $240k | $83k | 35% | 15.41 | 2 | 6% | 75% | 0 |
| 2025-11 | $229k | $79k | 35% | 14.52 | 2.1 | 7% | 74% | 0 |
| 2025-12 | $231k | $79k | 34% | 14.63 | 2.1 | 7% | 75% | 0 |
| 2026-01 | $226k | $78k | 34% | 14.32 | 2.2 | 7% | 72% | 0 |
| 2026-02 | $202k | $70k | 34% | 12.92 | 2.2 | 8% | 73% | 0 |
| 2026-03 | $224k | $78k | 35% | 14.27 | 2.2 | 1% | 74% | 0 |
| 2026-04 | $219k | $76k | 35% | 14.08 | 2.1 | 1% | 75% | 0 |
| 2026-05 | $234k | $82k | 35% | 14.99 | 2.1 | 2% | 74% | 0 |
Margin changes are not isolated. They move with service level, forecast error, customer retention pressure, and supplier quality.
Weak suppliers, stockout spikes, and overdue invoices should be cross-referenced before making procurement or pricing recommendations.
Use the latest month first, then compare against the trailing three months for seasonality and drift.